1 |
On domenica 11 luglio 2021 15:01:07 CEST Nils Freydank wrote: |
2 |
> Hi Stefano, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I couldn't reproduce your error with xelatex at all. I took your example/MWE |
5 |
> and just executed "xelatex test.tex" and it generated me a single page PDF. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> A quick and dirty idea: Move ~/.texlive (e.g. to ~/.texlive-bak) and let |
8 |
> texlive regenerate files there. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> In my worldfile I have app-text/texlive, dev-tex/biber and dev-tex/latexmk, |
11 |
> everything else are just deps. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Interestingly it works even with USE="-xetex" for texlive which in turn has |
14 |
> only the following USE flags enabled: |
15 |
> "X extra graphics luatex metapost music png pstricks science truetype" |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Hope that helps you, |
18 |
> Nils |
19 |
|
20 |
Thanks for the answer. I tried removing the .texlive directory, but nothing |
21 |
changed. However, on my laptop it worked correctly even with texlive-2021, |
22 |
which is strange because its configuration is very similar to that of my |
23 |
desktop PC (where it doesn't work). The list of texlive-related packages is |
24 |
the same in both machines, so I can't really understand what's going on. |
25 |
|
26 |
However, in the meanwhile, I found a workaround for the issue with LyX: |
27 |
enabling the "Use non-TeX fonts (via XeTeX/LuaTeX)" document setting makes it |
28 |
work even on the desktop PC (when I wrote the original mail, I had masked |
29 |
texlive-2021 on my laptop to have a system where LyX worked correctly; after |
30 |
discovering this workaround, I felt safe in upgrading it; I didn't think about |
31 |
testing this problem there). |
32 |
|
33 |
I had reported this issue on the LyX bug tracker and they answered me this |
34 |
issue would be fixed in a future release. |
35 |
|
36 |
Stefano |