Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: iptables mac filtering
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 02:10:26
Message-Id: loom.20060812T033806-702@post.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: iptables mac filtering by Richard Fish
1 Richard Fish <bigfish <at> asmallpond.org> writes:
2
3
4 > On 8/11/06, James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
5 > > myIP hackIP TCP 55634 > smtp (SYN) Seq=0 ACK=1 WIN=0 LEN=0
6 > > hackIP myIP TCP smtp > 55634 (RST,ACK) Seq=0 ACK=1 WIN=0 LEN=0 MSS=1460
7
8 > Assuming you haven't mixed up the myIP and hackIP parts, this means
9 > something on *your* system/network is trying to contact an smtp server
10 > on what you are calling hackIP. TCP/IP connections are initiated with
11 > a SYN packet. If they are accepted, you get a SYN,ACK packet back.
12 > If they are rejected, you get a RST,ACK back.
13
14 Sorry, I transposed the entries. From Wireshark I took my time to copy
15 more accurately
16 :
17 Source dest. proto info
18 24.199.244.157 myIP TCP 55634 > smtp (SYN) Seq=0 Len=0 MSS=1460
19 myIP 24.199.244.157 TCP smtp > 55634 (RST,ACK) Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=0 Len=0
20
21 > Running 'host <hackIP>' might prove enlightening.
22
23 # host 24.199.244.157
24 157.244.199.24.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
25 rrcs-24-199-244-157.midsouth.biz.rr.com.
26
27
28 Remember, the entire network, except the firewall was physically
29 disconnected. I did not save the Wireshark session at that time,
30
31 The lines above seen today, look very similar to the
32 packet storm the session last night.....
33
34 However, I'll try to save it, the next time it explodes. The
35 lines above are merely suspicious to me.
36 It does look like part of RoadRunner, but last night the
37 spam was in high gear, until I shut down the link....
38
39 thoughts?
40
41
42 James
43
44
45
46 --
47 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list