Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] udev-197 vs udev-200?? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 30 Mar 2013 16:43:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130330164226.65f1a16b@digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] udev-197 vs udev-200?? by Tanstaafl |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:24:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Why is it that when I comment out the package.mask entries for udev: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > #>=sys-fs/udev-181 |
| 6 | > #>=virtual/udev-181 |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > emerge -pvuND world shows updates to udev-197, with no mention of |
| 9 | > udev-200, but... |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Because you're running stable? Versions higher than 197-r8 are still in |
| 12 | testing. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Neil Bothwick |
| 17 | |
| 18 | "Meow" <SPLAT!> "Woof" <SPLAT!> Jeez, it's really raining today. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] udev-197 vs udev-200?? | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> |