| 1 |
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:30:19 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I seem to have them both installed with only my old version of MYthTV |
| 5 |
>> requiring qt-3.3.8 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That's easy then, switch to MythTV 0.22, it's much better :) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> -- |
| 11 |
> Neil Bothwick |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I don't care at all that it's much better. I care that what I have |
| 14 |
works and the family doesn't bother me. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
My Myth server is PowerPC based and so everytime I switch there's |
| 17 |
always things to relearn in terms of updating kernel and risks that |
| 18 |
others don't have. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
And I cannot update mythfrontend on my desktop machine without |
| 21 |
updating EVERY machine on the network to 0.22, so that's 2 desktops, 2 |
| 22 |
dedicated machines hooked to TVs and the server. That's a lot of work |
| 23 |
just because someone decides they don't want to support it anymore. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
On the other hand, if the qt4 qt3-support works then I don't update |
| 26 |
from 0.21 at all. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Again, I cannot see the 0.22 gives me anything I care about but |
| 29 |
there's no way to know until I commit to making the change. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Cheers, |
| 32 |
Mark |
Archives