1 |
J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> [16-11-30 10:44]: |
2 |
> On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 07:55:11 AM Meino.Cramer@×××.de wrote: |
3 |
> > J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> [16-11-30 07:28]: |
4 |
> > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 07:08:45 AM Meino.Cramer@×××.de wrote: |
5 |
> > > > J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> [16-11-30 06:48]: |
6 |
> > > > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 05:33:15 AM Meino.Cramer@×××.de wrote: |
7 |
> > > > > > Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@×××××.com> [16-11-30 05:08]: |
8 |
> > > > > > > Am Tue, 29 Nov 2016 07:42:16 +0100 |
9 |
> > > > > > > |
10 |
> > > > > > > schrieb Meino.Cramer@×××.de: |
11 |
> > > > > > > > I get sick of this [CESNORED] HTML5 stuff coming from YouTube! |
12 |
> > > > > > > > Most of the videos while playayaingnaying arereare |
13 |
> > > > > > > > stututterutering |
14 |
> > > > > > > > liiklike helellell. |
15 |
> > > > > > > > |
16 |
> > > > > > > > I tested a lot of HTML5 addons to fix that problem and googled |
17 |
> > > > > > > > around the world but nothing helps. The only thing I found is an |
18 |
> > > > > > > > iconic sentence, which is true in this case also: |
19 |
> > > > > > > > "You are not alone...!". |
20 |
> > > > > > > > |
21 |
> > > > > > > > Is there any way to feed the stream from youtube direktly into |
22 |
> > > > > > > > a not blown player like mpv/mplayer or such (I would prefer |
23 |
> > > > > > > > not to load a complete gui (vlc) with any click again and |
24 |
> > > > > > > > again.)? |
25 |
> > > > > > > |
26 |
> > > > > > > For me it was just the other way around. HTML5 mode played much |
27 |
> > > > > > > (very |
28 |
> > > > > > > much!) more smooth than flash player. I opted in early by that |
29 |
> > > > > > > time |
30 |
> > > > > > > for |
31 |
> > > > > > > switching YT to HTML5 player. This was for Chrome, of course, |
32 |
> > > > > > > because |
33 |
> > > > > > > by that time Firefox wasn't really compatible. |
34 |
> > > > > > > |
35 |
> > > > > > > You probably really should check your graphics stack. If you have |
36 |
> > > > > > > an |
37 |
> > > > > > > at |
38 |
> > > > > > > least somewhat decent machine (something which was built during |
39 |
> > > > > > > the |
40 |
> > > > > > > last 5 years), you should have absolutely no problems playing |
41 |
> > > > > > > videos |
42 |
> > > > > > > in |
43 |
> > > > > > > the HTML5 player. Even my aging machine in the office (which |
44 |
> > > > > > > didn't |
45 |
> > > > > > > play smooth videos in the flash player) runs full HD streaming |
46 |
> > > > > > > videos |
47 |
> > > > > > > smoothly in the HTML5 player - no stuttering, no blocking, no |
48 |
> > > > > > > framedrops. This was different with the flash player which looked |
49 |
> > > > > > > like |
50 |
> > > > > > > it dropped every second frame in fullscreen mode - but at least it |
51 |
> > > > > > > did |
52 |
> > > > > > > not stutter due to that "optimization". |
53 |
> > > > > > > |
54 |
> > > > > > > Maybe give some information about your graphics stack and |
55 |
> > > > > > > configuration... |
56 |
> > > > > > |
57 |
> > > > > > Hi Kai, |
58 |
> > > > > > |
59 |
> > > > > > I think that the hardware is not the problem, since downloading the |
60 |
> > > > > > video and playing it offline had resulted in no problems ever... |
61 |
> > > > > > |
62 |
> > > > > > Cheers |
63 |
> > > > > > Meino |
64 |
> > > > > |
65 |
> > > > > Meino, |
66 |
> > > > > |
67 |
> > > > > In one of your other emails, you mentioned that your ADSL is incapable |
68 |
> > > > > of |
69 |
> > > > > providing the full-HD stream. |
70 |
> > > > > This could easily be the cause for the issues you are having with |
71 |
> > > > > HTML5 |
72 |
> > > > > video as well. Maybe look into cache-options? |
73 |
> > > > > |
74 |
> > > > > -- |
75 |
> > > > > Joost |
76 |
> > > > |
77 |
> > > > Joost, |
78 |
> > > > |
79 |
> > > > did this (~/.config/mpv/mpv.config) with no positive effect. |
80 |
> > > > I decreased the video resolution to <1280 (again via mpv.conf) which |
81 |
> > > > helps to some degree. |
82 |
> > > > Interesting is: It hangs always a the same points in the video if |
83 |
> > > > playing the same video with different configurations. |
84 |
> > > > |
85 |
> > > > I called mpv with an url form the commandline and indeed it shows |
86 |
> > > > "playing video" and "buffering" (at this point it hangs) alternateing. |
87 |
> > > > |
88 |
> > > > The FF problem was not only hangs but something like the following |
89 |
> > > > sentence: |
90 |
> > > > |
91 |
> > > > Thehe quiquickkckick bkrowownwn foxoxfoxx joxujumumpjumpsumps |
92 |
> > > > oveovrver thhehe lazazylazyzy dogog |
93 |
> > > > |
94 |
> > > > Somehow three steps forward and two backwards. The audio was never |
95 |
> > > > effected though. |
96 |
> > > > |
97 |
> > > > With "Play with mpv" it """"only"""" hangs. |
98 |
> > > > |
99 |
> > > > Do I really need an new DSL contract with my provider becayse |
100 |
> > > > FF has switched to HTML5 only? |
101 |
> > > > |
102 |
> > > > Can't be...or? |
103 |
> > > |
104 |
> > > It depends. (seriously) |
105 |
> > > |
106 |
> > > What you describe is what I get when I'm using my mobile connection with |
107 |
> > > bad reception. In other words, it does sound like a bandwidth issue. |
108 |
> > > |
109 |
> > > Dave solves that by downloading the files and then watching it locally. |
110 |
> > > |
111 |
> > > What kind of bandwidth (up and down) do you have? And what else is using |
112 |
> > > that connection while you are trying to watch a video? |
113 |
> > > |
114 |
> > > I don't think it's HTML5 at fault, the same amount of data needs to be |
115 |
> > > transfered, but it might be that HTML5 is less bandwidth efficient than |
116 |
> > > Flash. |
117 |
> > > |
118 |
> > > I don't seem to have flash installed on my current machine and am using |
119 |
> > > FF45.5. In there, with Youtube, I do get the option to change the |
120 |
> > > resolution on the video-streams. Don't you get that? |
121 |
> > > |
122 |
> > > -- |
123 |
> > > Joost |
124 |
> > |
125 |
> > I checked the current bandwidth (07:48 am local time) with this |
126 |
> > http://speedcheck.vodafone.de/ |
127 |
> > |
128 |
> > and got: |
129 |
> > 2,1 Mbps download |
130 |
> > 0,1 Mbps upload |
131 |
> > 58 ms latency (ping test) |
132 |
> > |
133 |
> > There is no other kind of task which consumes bandwidth |
134 |
> > (while checking the above or while streaming videos) |
135 |
> |
136 |
> 0,1 Mbps upload... |
137 |
> This is really small. If there is a process that is uploading with 50Kbps |
138 |
> (=0,05Mbps), you will loose HALF of your download. |
139 |
> And 50Kbps is achieved really quickly. |
140 |
> |
141 |
> With this, I would kill any application that might use the internet, like |
142 |
> email. |
143 |
> |
144 |
> Anything less then 10Mbps down / 1Mbps up would not even be considered by me. |
145 |
> |
146 |
> > Another (real odd) possibillitu would be: Someone has |
147 |
> > hijacked my DSL modem (its no router) - its an older |
148 |
> > Fritz! box. |
149 |
> |
150 |
> That's always possible. But unless there is a massive DDOS going on right now, |
151 |
> I don't think that would be of any use. |
152 |
> |
153 |
> Do you use a network cable or wireless during tests? |
154 |
> |
155 |
> -- |
156 |
> Joost |
157 |
> |
158 |
|
159 |
Joost, |
160 |
|
161 |
everything is good old fashioned copper... |
162 |
|
163 |
-- |
164 |
Meino |