| 1 |
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Jarry <mr.jarry@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 26-May-12 22:01, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Jarry wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> after updating baselayout from 2.0.3 to 2.1-r1 /run is mounted |
| 8 |
>>> as tmpfs. But I can not find any mount-option for controlling |
| 9 |
>>> how much memory is (or could be) used for it. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on |
| 12 |
>>> tmpfs 8223848 224 8223624 1% /run |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> I know it does not use 8GB right now, yet I'd like to reduce |
| 15 |
>>> it to some lower value, not half of my physical memory. |
| 16 |
>>> How can I do it? Can I simply add line in fstab like: |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> none /run tmpfs size=128m 0 0 ??? |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> Jarry |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> Holy smoke ! Mine is doing the same thing. |
| 24 |
>> tmpfs 7.9G 260K 7.9G 1% /run |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> But I also have this: |
| 27 |
>> tmpfs 7.9G 0 7.9G 0% /var/tmp/portage |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> So, between those two, I could run out of ram since I have 16Gbs. |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
>> There is now TWO people that needs a answer to this question. Why does |
| 32 |
>> it need that much anyway? It looks to me like a few hundred Mbs, like |
| 33 |
>> Jarry posted, would be plenty. Jeepers creepers. lol |
| 34 |
>> |
| 35 |
>> Dale |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> I suppose default size for tmpfs is half of physical memory, |
| 39 |
> if it is not configured somewhere else. |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> BTW, is there any way to turn this great feature off? |
| 42 |
> What is it good for? I do not see any advantage in having |
| 43 |
> /run on tmpfs... |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
If /var/run is described in /etc/fstab, then you can use mount options |
| 46 |
to control the maximum size of the tmpfs. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.txt |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
-- |
| 51 |
:wq |
Archives