1 |
On 01/09/15 16:10, Emanuele Rusconi wrote: |
2 |
> On 1 September 2015 at 10:02, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
>> How many heads will explode? I have /etc/portage/package.use/package.use |
4 |
>> file (YES!) The only reason I made a package.use directory was because I |
5 |
>> set up a cross-build environment, so that my ancient 32-bit Atom netbook |
6 |
>> wouldn't have to spend 14 hours building Seamonkey. The cross-compiler |
7 |
>> *DEMANDS* a package.use directory. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> [d531][waltdnes][~] ll /etc/portage/package.use/ |
10 |
>> total 24 |
11 |
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 30 17:05 . |
12 |
>> drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 4096 Jul 30 17:03 .. |
13 |
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41 Mar 25 00:04 cross---help |
14 |
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 37 Mar 25 00:01 cross--p |
15 |
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 274 May 4 12:07 cross-i686-pc-linux-gnu |
16 |
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 585 Jul 30 17:05 package.use |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> -- |
19 |
>> Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
20 |
>> I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |
21 |
>> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Yeah, crazy, right? I mean, a configuration file WITHIN a directory!! |
24 |
> Woah, it's mind-boggling, dude!! |
25 |
> |
26 |
> -- Emanuele Rusconi |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
Hey! - I am not the only one doing this then :) |
30 |
|
31 |
And it was also because of a cross-compiler. When I looked at how much |
32 |
extra work this type fragmentation causes, and how little (or any!) |
33 |
advantage it gives makes one wonder about the designers sanity ... |
34 |
|
35 |
BillK |