Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Hampicke <gentoo-user@××××.biz> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] package masking | ||
| Date: | Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:47:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4F9C1EB0.2010600@hadt.biz | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] package masking by Neil Bothwick |
||
| 1 | > If you use portage-2.2, sets provide an easier way to do this. A set is |
| 2 | > just a list of package atoms, one per line, in a file |
| 3 | > in /etc/portage/sets, say /etc/portage/sets/gnome. Then you just emerge |
| 4 | > @gnome. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Portage Sets look nice, but I'm still on portage 2.1 - haven't tried 2.2 |
| 7 | yet, I just wanted a stable portage on my production boxes. |
| 8 | But that's no reason not to try it on my workstation here :) emerging |
| 9 | portage 2.2....... |