1 |
On 2019-03-29, Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> 190329 Grant Edwards wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> gcc-7.3.9-r3 is marked stable, yet it fails to build if you have the |
5 |
>> current stable version of glibc installed (2.28-r5). |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I've been using Gcc-8.2.0-r6 since 170302 with Glibc-2.27-r6 : no problems. |
8 |
|
9 |
What I'm asking about is that 7.3.0-r3 (which is stable) won't build |
10 |
with glibc-2.28 (which is stable). My question: is that considered a |
11 |
bug or not? One might think that the 7.3.0-r3 ebuild should require |
12 |
gblic < 2.28. Is one allowed to tweak ebuilds like that without |
13 |
bumping the revision? |
14 |
|
15 |
FWIW 7.3.0-r6 does build and works fine for my application which won't |
16 |
build with gcc-8 -- so it's purely an academic question. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Grant |