| 1 |
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:49:48 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > experience with compiling in tempfs is that it works, but has a much |
| 4 |
> > higher failure rate than on disk - i.e., things like OO/Lo, KDE, gcc |
| 5 |
> > and glibc have large space requirements that you must make sure tmpfs |
| 6 |
> > can satisfy before you start. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> em, no. KDE does not have large space requirements. LO does. The rest |
| 9 |
> is happy with 2gb of tmpfs diskspace. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
And portage checks for sufficient space for greedy packages before it |
| 12 |
starts emerging anything, so if there is a problem you know right away. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Therapy is expensive, popping bubble wrap is cheap! You choose. |
Archives