| 1 |
Nick Rout wrote: |
| 2 |
>>Holly Bostick wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>>>What would be different in the Gentoo you envision? |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> I'll bite too. ;-) On the gentoo-dev list I've heard talk of a QA feedback system so that users |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> can report WORKSFORME on unstable packages. This will provide the data |
| 10 |
> necessary to help know when packages should be marked stable. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> isn't that what bugs.gentoo.org is for? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Well, it can be, but what's really needed is a specialized QA feedback system specifically for the purpose of gathering data to determine whether or not specific ebuilds are worthy of being marked stable. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Zac |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives