1 |
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:42 AM, William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
>> I am however documenting my experiences for others than come after me |
4 |
>> to this question of "to ~amd64 or not ~amd64". Nothing more. It worked |
5 |
>> for Alan who is a __very__ experienced and capable person. It didn't |
6 |
>> work for Mark (at this point) who is a 10 year Gentoo user but |
7 |
>> __nothing__ more than a user type Those people can decide who they are |
8 |
>> closer to in capabilities and make their choice a bit more informed. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> I didn't wake up this morning thinking I could do what you and Neil |
11 |
>> and others on this list can with this distro. I'm not that silly! I |
12 |
>> just wanted to try ~amd64 to see what happened. It will take me less |
13 |
>> than 90 minutes to get to a new clean install if I blow everything |
14 |
>> away and start over. It's not a big deal. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> - Mark |
17 |
>> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Is there a reason why you want to run all @system as ~amd64, and the |
20 |
> rest stable. To me it makes more sense (especially for production |
21 |
> systems) to run @system as stable and only ~amd64 those apps and |
22 |
> dependencies you want/need to be bleeding edge. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Anyhow, what I really wanted to say is for more sensible unmasking, |
25 |
> check out autounmask: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> moriah home # esearch autounmask |
28 |
> [ Results for search key : autounmask ] |
29 |
> [ Applications found : 1 ] |
30 |
> |
31 |
> * app-portage/autounmask |
32 |
> Latest version available: 0.27 |
33 |
> Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ] |
34 |
> Size of downloaded files: 3 kB |
35 |
> Homepage: http://download.mpsna.de/opensource/autounmask/ |
36 |
> Description: autounmask - Unmasking packages the easy way |
37 |
> License: GPL-2 |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> moriah home # |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
William, |
44 |
In general I agree logically. There was no _strong_ reason for me |
45 |
to run ~arch on anything. I just wanted to try it out since the |
46 |
machine was new and this was a good time to get the experience vs |
47 |
having lots of stuff on the machine and trying to switch later. |
48 |
|
49 |
~arch @system was mainly to get a jump on the OpenRC migration |
50 |
before I had so much stuff on the system that I couldn't afford to |
51 |
just reformat and start over if I had problems with it. Having done it |
52 |
once I now know it won't be difficult later when it moves to stable. |
53 |
|
54 |
~arch xfce/gnome/kde on the other hand is not something I needed. |
55 |
It just comes with ~arch and for me didn't work so well. For me the |
56 |
desktop environment is mostly just a platform to get a browser or |
57 |
VMWare up and running. kde and it's brethren move forward but the |
58 |
revision level changes hardly impact me in normal life. |
59 |
|
60 |
Again, based on Alan's response, this isn't about me being upset or |
61 |
anything like that. I'm not upset in the least. Just trying things |
62 |
out. |
63 |
|
64 |
Thanks, |
65 |
Mark |