Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: nunojsilva@×××××××.pt
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: net-nntp/inn - This package is masked and could be removed soon!
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 23:39:33
Message-Id: ptfbn1$dq2$1@blaine.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] net-nntp/inn - This package is masked and could be removed soon! by R0b0t1
1 On 2018-11-25, R0b0t1 wrote:
2
3 > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 1:28 PM Grant Taylor
4 > <gtaylor@×××××××××××××××××××××.net> wrote:
5 >>
6 >> Hi,
7 >>
8 >> I happily use net-nntp/inn on my server and was surprised to find that
9 >> it is now masked and apparently up for removal. It looks like
10 >> maintenance has dropped off on the package.
11 >>
12 >> I've never maintained a portage overlay or otherwise contributed to
13 >> Gentoo (save for mailing lists). As such I don't know what I can do to
14 >> help.
15 >>
16 >> I did skim the Proxy Maintainers page [1] and don't know that I'm ready
17 >> to tackle that much responsibility. Is there something else that I can
18 >> do to help avoid the removal of the net-nntp/inn package? Possibly at
19 >> least keep it around as a masked package?
20 >>
21 >> Does anyone have any recommendations before blindly diving head first
22 >> into something I'll regret by assuming responsibility that I'm not sure
23 >> I'm ready for?
24 >>
25 >> Thanks for any pointers in advance.
26 >>
27 >
28 > It depends why it is up for removal. Fix that issue and submit a pull
29 > requests via GitHub or via email to gentoo-dev. If using gentoo-dev
30 > there is the possibility that it will never be allowed through the
31 > filter, so perhaps ask about it on IRC as well.
32
33 Why not bugzilla? Is there some new rule suggesting that bugzilla
34 shouldn't be used?
35
36 You might have just forgotten to mention it, that's okay -- I'm just
37 asking because bugzilla bugs 601032, 660966 and 663432 have made me
38 wonder if there is something going on, and I want to be sure I didn't
39 miss anything.
40
41 Especially 601032, which is about to turn 1 year old.
42
43 > In the rare chance that the package is just being removed because it's
44 > old, making gentoo-dev aware that you use it should be enough.
45 > Otherwise bump the version.
46
47 --
48 Nuno Silva