Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/local/portage does not seem to have a valid PORTDIR structure. | ||
| Date: | Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:21:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20051107091703.36937333@hactar.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/local/portage does not seem to have a valid PORTDIR structure. by Norberto Bensa |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:01:27 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I've found the problem. Portage doesn't like packge-0.0.1beta. Instead |
| 4 | > you must name it like package-0.0.1_beta. Now I need to do some magic |
| 5 | > inside the ebuild to s/_// |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Something along the lines of |
| 8 | |
| 9 | My_P=$(P/beta/_beta} |
| 10 | |
| 11 | and use ${My_P} instead of ${P} throughout the ebuild. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Neil Bothwick |
| 16 | |
| 17 | FINE: Tax for doing wrong. Tax: fine for doing fine. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/local/portage does not seem to have a valid PORTDIR structure. | Nagatoro <nagatoro@×××××.com> |