1 |
Am 26.06.2013 16:22, schrieb Alan McKinnon: |
2 |
> On 26/06/2013 15:09, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
3 |
>> Hi list |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> By chance I found an external 3 TB disk for a bargain and now I’m planning its |
6 |
>> partitioning. I am thus looking for a filesystem that doesn’t necessarily |
7 |
>> need file permissions to function, the reason being that I might want to take |
8 |
>> the disk to other people in order to copy files around. That’s why I don’t |
9 |
>> really want to use ext4 (my FS of choice for everything else). |
10 |
>> |
11 |
[...] |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> Windows compatibility is not a must, but a nice-to-have. That would reduce my |
14 |
>> remaining choices to ExFAT, I presume. |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
BTW: What's the Linux status on that one? |
18 |
|
19 |
> |
20 |
> That's how I see it too. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I used to use ext4 for external media but quickly found that my notebook |
23 |
> was the only box that could use them... |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
Isn't group id 100 defined as the users group on most Linuxen nowadays? |
27 |
|
28 |
chgrp 100 $mount && chmod 2777 $mount |
29 |
|
30 |
should work reasonably well. |
31 |
|
32 |
Regards, |
33 |
Florian Philipp |