1 |
Mark David Dumlao <madumlao <at> gmail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> Look up. the very first post contrastd coreos' systemd as opposed |
5 |
> to openrc, bringing words like "evil"ution into the park. |
6 |
|
7 |
That refers to the concept of conglomerates vs the people. |
8 |
Systemd is only mentioned in passing. If it offends you, ignore it, OK? |
9 |
I did not see any of the openrc camp chime in. Besides, as was pointed |
10 |
out |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
> later on we hear that coreos is "stealing" gentoo's ideas and hope |
14 |
> that it is CRUSHED. |
15 |
|
16 |
That references my long history with large corporations, like the MAE |
17 |
system that worked fine until the US congress gave the (US) internet to |
18 |
the conglomerate Telcos; and I issued a warning about that rant. It |
19 |
was only to substantiate what conglomerates do to otherwise wonderful |
20 |
open source projects, imho. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
> but why? its its own frigging distro now. not gentoo by a long shot. |
24 |
|
25 |
Many have stated that CoreOS is a gentoo (certainly inspired) derivative. |
26 |
The focus of "MY THREAD" is the ideas and technologies that CoreOS |
27 |
has lifted from Gentoo and my search for a robust "Clustering" paradigm |
28 |
that is gentoo centric and thusly landed squarely where CoreOS is. I have |
29 |
found many legacy codes that did the same thing as what CoreOS is doing, |
30 |
but for one reason or another they were abondoned. |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
> On Wednesday, December 03, 2014 02:39:53 AM Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
34 |
> > Why do I get the feeling that this is another episode of the "i hate |
35 |
> > LennartSoft(tm) too" circlejerk on the gentoo mailing list? |
36 |
> Why do I get the feeling you just want another flamewar? |
37 |
> I don't see any mention of systemd or anything else written by Lennart, > |
38 |
apart from your comment. |
39 |
|
40 |
This is correct, but, very sad. Since Gentoo is openly supporting OpenRC, |
41 |
I'm staying with Gentoo. If I want a thread on Systemd, I'll be sure to |
42 |
put it in the title. If systemd is casually mentioned, please don't |
43 |
get your "panties in a bunch", EVERYONE, as systemd is going to fine |
44 |
and the other init centric folks will be fine too. |
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
> > this mailing list used to be about gentoo. |
48 |
> It still is. |
49 |
|
50 |
AGREED. |
51 |
|
52 |
> > > I do not intend to follow the CoreOS commercial path. I intend to mod |
53 |
> > > gentoo to achieve those attractive attributes back into my "gentoo |
54 |
> > > proper". |
55 |
|
56 |
Boy, this and many other theme sentences pretty much spell out my |
57 |
interest in this thread. If anyone researches gentoo's history |
58 |
there was a rich environment on HPC, distributed, and clusters; somehow |
59 |
it all was allowed to atrophy and I do not find any valid reasons. |
60 |
My science/math needs dictate to me a need for a robust cluster based |
61 |
on Gentoo. My embedded needs dictate a need for a gentoo cluster. The |
62 |
deprecation of Tinderbox at Gentoo strongly suggests a need for a gentoo |
63 |
cluster. My routine admin needs dictate a need for a Gentoo Cluster. |
64 |
|
65 |
My girlfriend likes the idea of a Gentoo cluster. |
66 |
|
67 |
CoreOS is nothing more than something where I can robb original gentoo |
68 |
thunder from, for my gentoo cluster. Other than that, I do see CoreOS |
69 |
and it's primary sponsers, as *EVIL* OK? ymmv. |
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
And finally, I think that alll init systems are going to become very |
73 |
irrelevant in the next few years, as what they provide, can be passed |
74 |
from a *personal cluster* to any and all hardware, dymanically. That's |
75 |
what the cell phones (smart phones) do now. That is what the NSA |
76 |
has been doing for over a decade now. In fact that is what most all |
77 |
major nation states have been doing for a very long time. It's been |
78 |
"game set match" at the transistor level and with numerous back doors |
79 |
in the Rf domain, hidden deeply in the "Rf noise domain" for decades. |
80 |
Historically it was called "signal intercept". Do your research or |
81 |
find an accomplished EE with a few decades of experience in Rf and |
82 |
listen to them. It's old hat. |
83 |
|
84 |
Get real. Systemd is a piss_ant and is irrelevant, IMO! |
85 |
Openrc is not in my critical path either, although I have a very, |
86 |
very strong affection to it. It's called loyalty and much |
87 |
of the symbiotic relational world is build upon loyalty. Some |
88 |
do not understand this, and I cannot help those folks that do |
89 |
not understand loyalty. |
90 |
|
91 |
|
92 |
|
93 |
So, let's focus on modernizing Gentoo, shall we? |
94 |
|
95 |
OK? (focus dude, focus). |
96 |
|
97 |
hth, |
98 |
James |