1 |
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:44:07 PM Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 27 Aug 2015 20:30:17 Grant Edwards wrote: |
3 |
> > On 2015-08-27, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > > Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards <at> gmail.com> writes: |
5 |
> > >> For those of us with multiple Linux installations on a disk, that's a |
6 |
> > >> pretty big reason to stick with grub-legacy. |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > So you are saying (trying to read the 'tea leaves' here) that |
9 |
> > > grub legacy ( grub-static-0.97-r12) will work well on a 64 bit systems, |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > I still use it on all my 64-bit machines. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > > (u)efi with say multiple drives (> 2T) and Raid-1 configs like |
14 |
> > > btrfs-native or via lvm? |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > I haven't started using UEFI boot mode mode yet, so I don't know how |
17 |
> > thetwo grub's compare. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> UEFI do not need GRUB{1,2} or any other boot manager. They can boot any |
20 |
> kernel you drop in the EFI boot partition directly, as long as you set it up |
21 |
> so. It becomes cumbersome if you are planning to multiboot various kernels |
22 |
& |
23 |
> OS frequently. |
24 |
|
25 |
You do need a manager like efibootmgr unless you have a really good "bios" menu |
26 |
where you can manage your entries. Only removable media is autodetected on all |
27 |
EFI boxes I've seen. I use GRUB2 because my efi firmware (like most) is really |
28 |
buggy. Changing the boot order doesn't work at all (neither on the menu nor |
29 |
through efibootmgr), so I have to delete and recreate the entries in the right |
30 |
order. What I did is create 2 efi entries, one for my main kernel and one for |
31 |
grub2 and I added entries for all my secondary kernels and windows on the |
32 |
grub2 menu. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Fernando Rodriguez |