| 1 |
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:01:24 +0100 |
| 2 |
David W Noon <dwnoon@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:40:27 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote about Re: |
| 5 |
> [gentoo-user] InitRAMFS - boot expert sought: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:20:23 +0100 |
| 8 |
> > David W Noon <dwnoon@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:28:17 -0500, Dale wrote about Re: |
| 11 |
> > > [gentoo-user] InitRAMFS - boot expert sought: |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > > Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 14 |
> > > [snip] |
| 15 |
> > > >> Everything you fear about udev instantly ceases to exist and is |
| 16 |
> > > >> no longer a problem. Sorted. |
| 17 |
> > > |
| 18 |
> > > And /var ?? |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > What about /var? |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > The thread is about initramfs and putting /usr onto the / volume to |
| 23 |
> > get around early-boot prolems. |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > Surely you do not need the content of /var during early boot? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> With the pending changes to udev scripts, you could well need /var -- |
| 28 |
> and anything else -- before udev starts. So it is in the same |
| 29 |
> category as /usr. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Maybe, maybe not. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
However, no-one apart from you is even suggesting such a thing. For my |
| 34 |
part I'm going to ignore that possibility and concentrate on those |
| 35 |
things that are being seriously suggested. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Alan McKinnnon |
| 41 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives