1 |
On Nov 27, 2011 3:44 PM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> walt wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> Somewhere deep in the bowels of portage my 'introspection' useflag is |
6 |
>> vanishing -- but on just one of my three machines. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> I set the introspection useflag on all three machines (two ~amd64 and |
9 |
>> one ~x86) but when I run emerge --info, only two of the machines show |
10 |
>> the introspection useflag in the output. Why? |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> All three machines share the same /usr/portage by NFS, so they all |
13 |
>> see the same use.mask and use.force files, etc. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> I'm running the default linux desktop gnome profile on all three. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> I tried deleting my /etc/portage/* on the problem machine, which made |
18 |
>> no difference. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> I even tried using an empty make.conf and adding the single line |
21 |
>> USE="introspection", but that made no difference either. |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> When I flip other useflags in make.conf the changes show up in the |
24 |
>> output of emerge --info, but not when I flip 'introspection'. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> Two days wasted and I'm out of ideas. |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> Anyone understand the details of emerge --info or what I can do to |
29 |
>> diagnose this problem? |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> I searched the -dev mailing list and only found references to the flag |
35 |
being enabled on a lot of packages. It appears to be a Gnome thing but |
36 |
don't quote me on it. Is it possible that it is enable by default whether |
37 |
it is set or not? There was talk of making it on in the profile instead of |
38 |
make.conf. |
39 |
|
40 |
Yeah, could it be part of your profile? That's up in /etc so it could be |
41 |
different among hosts. |
42 |
|
43 |
> |
44 |
> I would do a emerge -pv <package that uses the flag> and see if it shows |
45 |
up there. If it is a small package, compile it then see if it is built in |
46 |
or not. If it is, then they have it turned on somewhere. This is a bug |
47 |
report that you can read on too. |
48 |
> |
49 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324989 |
50 |
> |
51 |
> That help any? |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Dale |
54 |
> |
55 |
> :-) :-) |
56 |
> |
57 |
> -- |
58 |
> I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
59 |
how you interpreted my words! |
60 |
> |
61 |
> |