| 1 |
On 29/03/2014 01:48, Chris Stankevitz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> You need opencv as it's a dep for something, and portage wants you to |
| 4 |
>> have a version that's in the tree. The only stable version is 2.4.5 but |
| 5 |
>> you have masked that in package.mask |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Hi Alan, |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I attempted to mask only opencv greater than 2.4.5 (i.e. 2.4.6, 2.4.7, |
| 10 |
> 2.4.8). I wonder if my greater than symbol was interpreted as a |
| 11 |
> "reply quote": |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> *** jane ~ # grep opencv /etc/portage/package.mask |
| 14 |
> *** # 2014-03-13: Hold off on opencv upgrade |
| 15 |
> *** >media-libs/opencv-2.4.5 |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Hi Chris, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Yes, that's exactly what happened. It's quite funny actually :-) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
You did post emerge output using -t and it shows up at the top level |
| 22 |
which is a bit odd, it implies portage wants to update opencv anyway, |
| 23 |
not as a result of it being a dep. Are you sure you didn't keyword |
| 24 |
opencv and forget about it? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
grep -r opencv /etc/portage |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
and to be complete, what are the deps for the package: |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
equery depends opencv |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 35 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives