Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Problems with aclocal
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 22:21:50
Message-Id: 51819531.8090203@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Problems with aclocal by Rafa Griman
1 Top-posting as inline replies don't fit here.
2
3 auto* errors can be tricky to solve, in my experience they tend to be
4 once off weird errors when packages can't quite make sense out of what
5 the auto* scripts are telling them.
6
7 Let's get some facts on the table so we can proceed:
8
9 Which packages were failing originally?
10 What versions of the various auto* packages do you have installed?
11 When did you last resync the tree?
12
13
14 P.S. You've no doubt seen that forum posts have a high hit-rate of
15 "throw stuff at the wall and see what sticks", the posts you mention
16 show that happening. Randomly masking stuff hoping it will work is not a
17 good fault-finding technique :-)
18
19
20
21
22
23 On 02/05/2013 00:01, Rafa Griman wrote:
24 > Hi Alan,
25 >
26 > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
27 >> On 01/05/2013 23:05, Rafa Griman wrote:
28 >>> Hi all :)
29 >>>
30 >>> Got some problems with aclocal :( When running:
31 >>>
32 >>> emerge -avDuN --with-bdeps=y world
33 >>>
34 >>> I get a whole bunch of packages who won't install nor upgrade with the
35 >>> following error:
36 >>>
37 >>> Failed Running aclocal !
38 >>>
39 >>> Looking through the Forums I saw I've got to mask autoconf.
40 >>
41 >> You got that from the Forums, huh?
42 >
43 >
44 > Yup. I also saw a post saying he solved his issue by removing all the
45 > versions except the latest one. Tried that too and portage keeps
46 > rebuilding both versions:
47 >
48 > # equery list autoconf
49 > * Searching for autoconf ...
50 > [IP-] [ ] sys-devel/autoconf-2.13:2.1
51 > [IP-] [ ] sys-devel/autoconf-2.69:2.5
52 >
53 >
54 >
55 >> Um yeah, well, signal to noise there is out the roof.
56 >>
57 >> I'd be double checking exactly what the Forum user said, as masking
58 >> autoconf seems to me like a guaranteed way to get portage to whinge very
59 >> loud and very long (half the tree DEPENDS on autoconf).
60 >
61 >
62 > That's why I'm writing, sounds a bit weird to me ...
63 >
64 >
65 >> Maybe the poster meant to mask a /specific/ version of autoconf?
66 >> Start by masking the latest version you installed and proceed from there.
67 >
68 >
69 > Tried that too but still get the same error:
70 >
71 > Failed Running aclocal !
72 >
73 > No matter what version I mask in:
74 >
75 > vim /etc/portage/package.mask/masked
76 >
77 > I get that same error. I have rebuilt automake and automake-wrapper
78 > too just in case. Have also run:
79 >
80 > revdep-rebuild
81 >
82 > emerge --depclean
83 >
84 > perl-cleaner --all
85 >
86 > python-updater
87 >
88 > I have also unmerged the previous versions of automake and left the
89 > latest, but portage rebuilds 2 other versions so I end up with:
90 >
91 > # equery list automake
92 > * Searching for automake ...
93 > [IP-] [ ] sys-devel/automake-1.10.3:1.10
94 > [IP-] [ ] sys-devel/automake-1.11.6:1.11
95 > [IP-] [ ] sys-devel/automake-1.13.1:1.13
96 >
97 >
98 > TIA
99 >
100 > Rafa
101 >
102
103
104 --
105 Alan McKinnon
106 alan.mckinnon@×××××.com