Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Re: [gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:45:54
Message-Id: 55F68938.5080602@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [SOLVED] Re: [gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it by wraeth
1 wraeth wrote:
2 > On 14/09/15 15:34, Dale wrote:
3 > > Well, I'd be chicken to have two packages dealing with /dev at the
4 > > same time, although portage says it is not a blocker.
5 >
6 > > For future reference, I went and dug in this path:
7 >
8 > > /var/db/pkg/sys-fs
9 >
10 > > It turned out it was just a empty directory and deleting it cleared
11 > > it up. Since it was empty, I guess that was safe enough. If
12 > > anything was in it, then I'd be wanting to make sure it was safe to
13 > > remove first.
14 >
15 > > So, it's fixed. I get a clean eix run and if its happy, I'm happy.
16 > > ;-)
17 >
18 > Granted I don't know your setup, but having nothing installed from
19 > sys-fs/* seems a little odd to me. For example, I have the following
20 > packages installed from the sys-fs category:
21 >
22 > eix -cI\#C sys-fs
23 > sys-fs/btrfs-progs
24 > sys-fs/cryptsetup
25 > sys-fs/e2fsprogs
26 > sys-fs/fuse
27 > sys-fs/lvm2
28 > sys-fs/ntfs3g
29 > sys-fs/udev
30 > sys-fs/udev-init-scripts
31 > sys-fs/udisks
32 >
33 > Accordingly, I have the following in /var/db/pkg/sys-fs/
34 >
35 > ls -lhn /var/db/pkg/sys-fs
36 > total 0
37 > drwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 534 2015-09-14 09:51 btrfs-progs-4.2
38 > drwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 520 2015-09-10 11:14 cryptsetup-1.6.8
39 > drwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 494 2015-09-10 12:56 e2fsprogs-1.42.13
40 > drwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 494 2015-09-10 18:29 fuse-2.9.4
41 > drwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 526 2015-09-10 21:41 lvm2-2.02.116
42 > drwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 520 2015-09-10 11:13 ntfs3g-2015.3.14
43 > drwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 538 2015-09-10 22:21 udev-225
44 > drwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 464 2015-09-10 19:02 udev-init-scripts-30
45 > drwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 512 2015-09-11 03:26 udisks-2.1.6
46 >
47 > If you legitimately don't have anything installed from the sys-fs
48 > category, then all should be safe I guess; but if you do, then other
49 > mysteries may be afoot...
50 >
51
52
53 I have this:
54
55 root@fireball / # equery list sys-fs/*
56 * Searching for * in sys-fs ...
57 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/dfc-3.0.5-r1:0
58 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/dosfstools-3.0.28:0
59 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.42.13:0
60 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/eudev-3.1.2-r10:0
61 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/fuse-2.9.4:0
62 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.110:0
63 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/mdadm-3.3.1-r2:0
64 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/mtools-4.0.15:0
65 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/ntfs3g-2014.2.15-r1:0
66 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/reiser4progs-1.0.9:0
67 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/reiserfsprogs-3.6.24:0
68 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/shake-0.999:0
69 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/treesize-0.54.1:0
70 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-27:0
71 [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/udisks-2.1.4:2
72 root@fireball / #
73
74 I use eudev to manage /dev. Since I know I already have software to
75 manage that, I didn't want to emerge that failed one since it could
76 clash with what I already have installed. That said, portage didn't
77 show it as a blocker or anything. I likely could have emerged it, then
78 unmerged it and not cause a problem. I was just to chicken to do it is
79 all.
80
81 In my search, I was searching for static-dev so it would only show
82 matches to that and not the other packages in sys-fs. If I had searched
83 for sys-fs/* then it would have shown what was installed in that category.
84
85 The biggest thing, I just didn't want to screw something up and google
86 wasn't returning anything when I searched. No clue why it didn't tho.
87 It's rare that google shows no matches. It usually finds something even
88 if it is off the mark a bit.
89
90 Dale
91
92 :-) :-)

Replies