Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: BRM <bm_witness@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around?
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 04:35:13
Message-Id: 178414.37889.qm@web65407.mail.ac4.yahoo.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around? by Dale
1 ----- Original Message ----
2
3 > From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
4 > > ----- Original Message ----
5 > >> From: Neil Bothwick
6 > >> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
7 > >> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:34:18 -0800 (PST), BRM wrote:
8 > >>> Aside from that, I'm not sure I have ever really run "emerge
9 > >>> --depclean", but I also rarely uninstall anything, but don't install
10 > >>> things left or right to try out either, so typically upgrades are all I
11 > >>> need to do.
12 > >>>
13 > >> You should still run --depclean as dependencies change and you could still
14 > >> have plenty of no longer needed ones installed.
15 > >>
16 > > Okay - so I ran "emerge --depclean -a" and got the below.
17 > > I tried running "emerge world -vuDNa" as specified, but that didn't resolve it
18 > either.
19 > >
20 > > I tried looking in the world file (/var/lib/portage/world) but didn't find any
21 > entries that felt safe to remove.
22 > > So, how do I resolve?
23 > >
24 > > Calculating dependencies... done!
25 > > * Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
26 > > * the following required packages not being installed:
27 > > *
28 > > * ~x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.2 pulled in by:
29 > > * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
30 > > *
31 > > * ~x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.2 pulled in by:
32 > > * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
33 > > *
34 > > * ~x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.2 pulled in by:
35 > > * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
36 > > *
37 > > * ~x11-libs/qt-assistant-4.4.2 pulled in by:
38 > > * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
39 > > *
40 > > * ~x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.2 pulled in by:
41 > > * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
42 > > *
43 > > * ~x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.4.2 pulled in by:
44 > > * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
45 > > *
46 > > * ~dev-libs/poppler-0.10.7 pulled in by:
47 > > * virtual/poppler-0.10.7
48 > > *
49 > > * ~x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.2 pulled in by:
50 > > * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
51 > > *
52 > > * ~x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.2 pulled in by:
53 > > * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
54 > > *
55 > > * ~x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.2 pulled in by:
56 > > * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
57 > > *
58 > > * ~x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.2 pulled in by:
59 > > * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
60 > > *
61 > > * ~x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.2 pulled in by:
62 > > * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
63 > > *
64 > > * Have you forgotten to run `emerge --update --newuse --deep world` prior
65 > > * to depclean? It may be necessary to manually uninstall packages that no
66 > longer
67 > > * exist in the portage tree since it may not be possible to satisfy their
68 > > * dependencies. Also, be aware of the --with-bdeps option that is
69 > documented
70 > > * in `man emerge`.
71 > >
72 > >
73 >
74 > I ran into this a long time ago and I added this to my make.conf so that
75 > I don't forget. Try running this:
76 >
77 > emerge -uvDNa --with-bdeps y world
78 >
79 > Then see what that does. That added bit makes it look deeper into
80 > dependencies.
81
82 Okay, tried that. I did install 7 more packages (1 new, 6 rebuilds/updates).
83 But it didn't resolve the problem. I'm trying to determine if qt-4.4.2 is even installed.
84 Looking at /usr/lib there doesn't appear to be any qt-4.4.2 libs, only qt-4.5.3.
85
86 "qlist -Ia | grep x11-libs | grep qt" only returns the following:
87 /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.keep_x11-libs_qt-3
88 /etc/qt4/.keep_x11-libs_qt-core-4
89
90 Also, "find | grep libQt | grep 4\.4" didn't return anything, while "find | grep libQt | grep 4\.5 returned what I saw in /usr/lib/qt4.
91
92 So, then is x11-libs/qt-4.4.2 even installed? If not, how do I get rid of this?
93
94 TIA,
95
96 Ben
97
98 > Like you, I thought that was what the -D did but
99 > apparently that only goes to a certain depth then stops. If you want to
100 > add that to make.conf like I did, this is what goes there:
101 >
102 > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--with-bdeps y"
103 >
104 > It's your choice whether to add that or not. It will make emerge
105 > process what needs to be updated a while longer tho.
106 >
107 > Dale
108 >
109 > :-) :-)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around? Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>