1 |
Yes. That is how the pool URL works. It does some sort of load-balancing |
2 |
via |
3 |
|
4 |
> DNS resolution. That's why it has so many addresses. |
5 |
|
6 |
I am well aware of the /etc/hosts hack, but it's an ugly work-around. I'd |
7 |
> rather be able to configure portage itself to use a different pool or a |
8 |
> specific |
9 |
> server, rather than mess around with DNS resolutions. And I haven't been |
10 |
> having any luck in searching for how to configure the keyserver used by |
11 |
> Portage. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Yes, there is an email address I could message to notify them that there |
14 |
> is a |
15 |
> problematic server, but because Portage tells me nothing about which |
16 |
> server |
17 |
> it's using other than the pool URL, I have nothing helpful to tell them. |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
Since you know the server IPs, and there's only a small number so you could |
21 |
try connection to each of them and see which one(s) fail. |
22 |
|
23 |
Or tcpdump, or netstat etc. |