| 1 |
El Mie, 4 de Febrero de 2009, 16:39, Prado, Renato (R.P.) escribió: |
| 2 |
>> My question can be put like this: Do binary distro's per package |
| 3 |
>> optimiziations override the benefit of having arch specific |
| 4 |
>> optimiziations that gentoo allows? |
| 5 |
> Thinking about that... I guess a could future for future portage |
| 6 |
> releases would be a USE flag the overrides the system's CFLAGS (besides |
| 7 |
> -march) to what the package maintainer recommends. This would be |
| 8 |
> interesting for processor-intensive stuff, like ffmpeg for example. This |
| 9 |
> would also allow users to try some more dangerous flags only for packages |
| 10 |
> were they are known to be safe. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Unless you mean a different thing, that can be achieved and |
| 13 |
is already done in some packages. For example, mplayer has a |
| 14 |
USE flag called custom-cflags which freely allow you to break |
| 15 |
it as much as you want. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And if an ebuild bothers you filtering flags, you can always overlay |
| 18 |
it and remove the filters. If you can't do that, you definitely |
| 19 |
don't qualify to break your CFLAGS. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Jesús Guerrero |
Archives