1 |
Mick writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Wednesday 24 Aug 2011 23:30:16 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> > I also discovered that kmail2 doesn't do changing of IMAP folders at |
6 |
> > all, it seems to be strictly read-only. I can create folders in that |
7 |
> > area to my heary's content, nothing shows on disk. |
8 |
|
9 |
This works fine here. |
10 |
|
11 |
> > Kmail2 doesn't seem |
12 |
> > to support server-side at all. I can create folders in claws easily |
13 |
> > enough and they show up, but not the other way round. It doesn't seem |
14 |
> > to be a delayed update either - 12 hours later is a bit too long for |
15 |
> > that. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> My previous response was about Kmail-1. Kmail-2 should *not* be used |
18 |
> according to one developer's blog (4 months old): |
19 |
> |
20 |
> https://thomasmcguire.wordpress.com/category/kmail/ |
21 |
|
22 |
The first post there is 4 moths old, the next one (about kmail2) is 15 |
23 |
months old, talking about KDE 4.5. |
24 |
|
25 |
But while it's not _that_ bad any more, I was indeed advised on the kde list |
26 |
that ordinary users are not supposed yet to make the switch. That was when |
27 |
KDE 4.6.4 came out, I'm not sure how the situation is now. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
> I've seen quite a lot of complains about slowness and missing local |
31 |
> folders like ... Inbox! when I googled for it. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Good luck in getting your messages back. |
34 |
|
35 |
They are in the backup, aren't they? |
36 |
|
37 |
Wonko |