1 |
On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Joshua Murphy wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu> wrote: |
6 |
>>> I get dependency problems in my normal update world that I can't |
7 |
>>> understand. The entire output is below. |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> As far as I can tell gnome-2.32.1-r1 (which is installed) is requiring |
10 |
>>> packages from gnome-3, which must be wrong. I don't see any such |
11 |
>>> dependencies in the ebuild for gnome-2.32.1-r1 and there is an "official |
12 |
>>> mask list" (which I am using) for those of us who want to |
13 |
>>> delay installing gnome-3 for a while. |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> My conclusion that gnome-2... is requiring gnome-3 packages (which I |
16 |
>>> know is wrong) comes from two points in the output below. |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> 1. The indenting of the --tree --verbose output seems to say this |
19 |
>>> (e.g., the first two lines say gnome-2... depends on nautilus-3) |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>>> 2. The comments related to mask changes at the bottom say |
22 |
>>> evince-3... is required by gnome-2... |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>>> Please help. |
25 |
>>> thanks, |
26 |
>>> allan |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> Without doing any digging (I'm 100mi away from my Gentoo boxes and |
30 |
>> sitting on satellite internet, so SSH is painful), I would presume the |
31 |
>> packages pulling in those dependencies aren't specifying a maximum |
32 |
>> version, so it's not that they're "requiring" gnome 3 packages, |
33 |
>> they're requiring gnome packages and are choosing to use the newest, |
34 |
>> which happens to be part of 3, meaning the gnome 2 ebuilds would need |
35 |
>> updated to require version < 3.0 to avoid it automatically, and |
36 |
>> possibly block on mixing 2 and 3 if the mixing really does give |
37 |
>> issues. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> All the gnome-3 packages are masked (package.mask). |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Indeed, at the end of my output (see prev msg) you see recommendations |
42 |
> from emerge for me to remove some masks. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> allan |
45 |
|
46 |
It was more subtle than I thought. A big tip from Alexandre Rostovtsev |
47 |
suggested that the problem might be that some package other than |
48 |
gnome-base/gnome might be requiring nautilus-3 *OR introspection*. |
49 |
|
50 |
Sure enough the new evince was the culprit. I put in a workaround for |
51 |
today but everything should be fine tomorrow due to ... |
52 |
|
53 |
From: Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu> |
54 |
Subject: Re: [Bug 395173] gnome-light-2.32 shouldn't depend on >=x11-themes/gnome-themes-standard-3.0.2 |
55 |
To: Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o> |
56 |
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:47:08 -0500 |
57 |
|
58 |
On Mon, Dec 19 2011, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: |
59 |
|
60 |
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 10:59 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote: |
61 |
>> The equery d command (with depth=2 or depth=30) shows no mention of |
62 |
>> gnome-3, but *does* show introspection. Specifically |
63 |
>> |
64 |
>> app-text/evince-2.32.0-r3 (nautilus ? >=gnome-base/nautilus-2.10[introspection?]) |
65 |
>> |
66 |
> Ah, that explains it. |
67 |
> |
68 |
> When we unmasked gobject-introspection in August, the introspection |
69 |
> USE flag was masked on versions of gnome-2 packages that were already |
70 |
> stable, including on <app-text/evince-2.32.0-r4 and |
71 |
> <gnome-base/nautilus-2.32.2.1-r2. |
72 |
> |
73 |
> Two days ago, evince was bumped to 2.32.0-r4 to fix a crash. |
74 |
> Therefore, evince-2.32.0-r4 became the first gnome-2 version of evince |
75 |
> that had introspection unmasked, and it wanted to pull in |
76 |
> nautilus[introspection]. But the latest gnome-2 version of nautilus in |
77 |
> portage was nautilus-2.32.2.1-r1, which had introspection masked. |
78 |
> Therefore, evince-2.32.0-r4 effectively depended on nautilus-3. And |
79 |
> since nautilus-3 and evince-2.32.0-r4 are both in ~arch, repoman (the |
80 |
> automatic script that gentoo developers use to check their ebuilds |
81 |
> before committing) did not catch the problem :( |
82 |
> |
83 |
> I have now fixed it by bumping nautilus to 2.32.2.1-r2, and have |
84 |
> alerted the other gnome team members to be aware of this issue. |
85 |
> |
86 |
> Thank you very much for reporting this as soon as you did! |
87 |
> |
88 |
> -Alexandre. |
89 |
|
90 |
Great. So tomorrow, my resync will find nautilus...-r2 and I will be |
91 |
able to remove |
92 |
app-text/evince -introspection |
93 |
from package.use. |
94 |
(That is the workaround I put in today to permit an update world to |
95 |
proceed without gnome-3). |
96 |
|
97 |
Case closed! |
98 |
allan |