| 1 |
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:10:33 +0200 |
| 2 |
dexter <dexters84@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Mick pisze: |
| 7 |
> > On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Duane Griffin wrote: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> >> On 15/10/2007, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:26:02 +0200, dexter wrote: |
| 12 |
> >>> |
| 13 |
> >>>> While tar-ing it I've messed up the command and file got deleted |
| 14 |
> >>>> - I need it back desperately |
| 15 |
> >>>> |
| 16 |
> >>> emerge testdisk and run photorec. |
| 17 |
> >>> |
| 18 |
> >> But be sure it doesn't compile on the same partition that contained |
| 19 |
> >> the lost data! |
| 20 |
> >> |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > Suggest you try testdisk with a LiveCD and stop messing about with |
| 23 |
> > the drive in question in case you overwrite the disk space in |
| 24 |
> > question. |
| 25 |
> Unfortunatelly it is impossible to use live cd, so is not messing |
| 26 |
> with hard drive - there are services on it that must remain online |
| 27 |
> I've asked around, and found pretty cool solution |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> on another system I do: nc -l -p 21 > drive_image.dd |
| 30 |
> on server with deleted file I do: dd if=/dev/hda1 | nc -q 2 <ip of |
| 31 |
> another system> 21 |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> after that I can play around with drive_image.dd using for example |
| 34 |
> autopsy |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I'm afraid I don't think that's going to work too well for you. You |
| 38 |
see, hardware diagnostics generally employ methods of reading older |
| 39 |
data on the drive because it leaves some kind of electromagnetic |
| 40 |
'residue' on the drive. In other words, the diagnostic access you need |
| 41 |
requires access to the hard drive you want to diagnose. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives