1 |
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:44:32 +0000 (UTC), James wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> To Neil and Alan: These examples are trite and are simply and quickly |
4 |
> offered up as examples on each others perspectives, irrespecitve of |
5 |
> minutia. Old dogs snarl quite a bit, but do not move off of their |
6 |
> haunches, unless sufficiently motivated. |
7 |
|
8 |
I like that one :) |
9 |
|
10 |
> WE can all "wax poetic" about do's and don't of trite examples: the |
11 |
> point is it's not KDE place to change *MY* anything, unless I want it |
12 |
> by taking specific action or they use a proper roll out semantic. KDE |
13 |
> lost site of that, and many astute folks have left for greener |
14 |
> pastures. QT/Nokia going over to the "dark side" (aka MicroSoft) has |
15 |
> not helped KDE either. |
16 |
|
17 |
Oh, I got rid of the semantic stuff years ago. I try to put my files in |
18 |
logical folders, and for when I don't there are always find, grep and |
19 |
panic - in that order. |
20 |
|
21 |
As I said, I've tried other desktops before, I know KDE uses a lot of |
22 |
resources, but I always found them wanting. I was messing with a live CD |
23 |
today and saw a KDE/Openbox option in the login options. So I installed |
24 |
Openbox on my desktop machine and that option appeared. I still get my |
25 |
KDE apps but with Openbox instead of Plasma and KWin, and first |
26 |
impressions are that it is much faster. |
27 |
|
28 |
I may find something I can't do without by tomorrow, and it doesn't look |
29 |
as nice (yet) but this may be just the compromise that suits me. |
30 |
Discussions like this are useful in getting you to explore other options, |
31 |
even if you have tried to before. |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Neil Bothwick |
36 |
|
37 |
Keyboard: (n.) a device used by programmers to write software for a mouse |
38 |
or joystick and by operators for playing games such as 'word processing.' |