1 |
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
3 |
>> On Donnerstag 22 Januar 2009, Dan Farrell wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> Hi all, |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> I recently updated my dell Inspirion 8100's software after I found to |
8 |
>>> my suprise I could no longer play video fast enough to watch. I did a |
9 |
>>> kernel upgrade from 2.6.24 to 2.6.28, with a number of |
10 |
>>> reconfigurations, including moving from madwifi to in-kernel ath5k. |
11 |
>>> Also updated nvidia-drivers to go along with the new system. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> Now my system is extremely sluggish. It updates the screen very slowly |
14 |
>>> in X and CPU performance is noticably slower without X running too. |
15 |
>>> WiFi speed is dismal. |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> I tried to remove all cruft and extras from the kernel, but I haven't |
18 |
>>> managed to improve matters yet. Since it now takes hours to update the |
19 |
>>> system, I was hoping someone might have and idea as to what the cause |
20 |
>>> of the slowdown might be. |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>>> Sound Familiar? Any guesses? |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> group scheduling? get rid of it. |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I have been using 2.6.23 kernel for a while for the same reason. I'm |
32 |
> going to check my config now. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Dale |
35 |
|
36 |
On my laptop it is noticeably sluggish when using SLUB instead of SLAB |
37 |
(despite SLUB being the default, I find it to be worse every time I've |
38 |
tried it so far) |