| 1 |
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 17:59:49 +0200 (CEST), Alain Didierjean wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > > the above lib won't compile with a "emake error". Is it me or |
| 4 |
> > > anyone else had that type of problem ? |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > It's just you. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Please post emerge output. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Thanks. Emerge output: emake error. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Your portage installation is seriously screwed if that is all the output |
| 16 |
you get. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Don't try to guess which parts of the output are relevant, if you could do |
| 19 |
that you could probably work out the cause of the problem. Post the full |
| 20 |
output plus any other information that output tells you to (and it |
| 21 |
does). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Remember, you are the one sat in front of your terminal, the rest of us |
| 24 |
only know what you told us, and so far your two mails have said. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
It doesn't work. |
| 27 |
It doesn't work because of an error. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
There are some clever people on this list but, AFAIK, no magicians or |
| 30 |
mind readers. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> I could'nt find an emake executable. Which package contains such a |
| 33 |
> beast ? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
emake is a portage function, not a standalone executable. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
QOTD: |
| 42 |
The only easy way to tell a hamster from a gerbil is that the |
| 43 |
gerbil has more dark meat. |
Archives