| 1 |
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Whether "many" operations are written in Fortran is immaterial. What matters |
| 5 |
>> to me is whether any on my system are. If they aren't, I don't need a |
| 6 |
>> Fortran compiler and I'd rather not waste system resources on building one. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> Try euse -I fortran. |
| 9 |
> If anything besides gcc pops up, you should have one. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Regards |
| 12 |
> Michael |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That doesn't appear to work like it should then. I get this: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
root@fireball / # euse -I fortran |
| 19 |
global use flags (searching: fortran) |
| 20 |
************************************************************ |
| 21 |
[+ CD ] fortran - Adds support for fortran (formerly f77) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Installed packages matching this USE flag: |
| 24 |
sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5 |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
local use flags (searching: fortran) |
| 27 |
************************************************************ |
| 28 |
no matching entries found |
| 29 |
root@fireball / # |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Thing is, I know a couple packages use it on this rig because I just had |
| 32 |
to recompile them. Cantor and R are two that I recall. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Maybe it is because it is not a option in the list? The USE flag that is. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Dale |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
:-) :-) |
Archives