1 |
On Tuesday 10 Nov 2015 19:41:46 Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
> > On 10/11/2015 21:07, Stanislav Nikolov wrote: |
4 |
> >> 8GB of RAM are waaay more than I use daily (several firefox tabs, nvim = |
5 |
> >> 2Gb max), I have a pretty fast SSD too. Even buying 8GB RAM and a brand |
6 |
> >> new SSD, I have > $450 left. Can I buy a AMD CPU that will get the job |
7 |
> >> done faster than 6700k and/or cheaper? |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > That changes things. It wasn't obvious you already had RAM & SSD & stuff. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > I'd first make sure I have a decent PSU - none of that crap puny |
12 |
> > el-cheapo $300 shit (search list archives for 1000s of posts about dodgy |
13 |
> > PSUs). Then split the difference between 8G RAM, a good CPU and an |
14 |
> > excellent motherboard. You will use that extra RAM, and a motherboard |
15 |
> > that ties all the bits together properly is much more cost-effective |
16 |
> > than raw CPU grunt alone. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> If he needs a guide to at least increase the odds of getting a good P/S, |
19 |
> this may help. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Review_Cat&recatnum= |
22 |
> 13 |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I been reading their reviews for a few years. They are pretty tough. |
26 |
> To be honest, if I picked out one that rated 8 on their scale, that |
27 |
> would likely be a good P/S for me. You get into the 9's and it should |
28 |
> be a really good one. Short of lightening, it would be the last thing |
29 |
> I'd expect trouble from. They torture them pretty well. Should be the |
30 |
> worst a P/S should ever see, example, air conditioner goes out and its |
31 |
> really warm that day. Also, they take them apart so you can see what |
32 |
> is inside them, good brand of caps for example. Still, they include the |
33 |
> quality of the build and parts in their scoring. If a company skimps on |
34 |
> that, they deduct points. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Honestly tho, the P/S is a critical part. If it fails, it can wreak all |
37 |
> kinds of havoc. I've seen P/Ss go out and take a mobo, hard drive or |
38 |
> something else out with it. After all, pretty much everythign plugs |
39 |
> into power somehow. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Hope that helps. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Dale |
44 |
> |
45 |
> :-) :-) |
46 |
> |
47 |
> P. S. Makes me want to upgrade my CPU to a 8 core now. I need a hard |
48 |
> drive first tho. ;-) |
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
Yes, a good quality PSU will safeguard your components and your data. Buy |
52 |
something with Japanese capacitors. |
53 |
|
54 |
BTW, let me correct earlier numbers .... My i7 timings are from a conventional |
55 |
emerge of firefox with /var/tmp/portage on a spinning drive. The laptop does |
56 |
not have enough memory to emerge FF on a tmpfs. :p |
57 |
|
58 |
The AMD emerge timings was derived on a 2400MHz tmpfs. So this was somewhat |
59 |
an apples and oranges comparison. Apologies for a bum steer. I wouldn't be |
60 |
surprised if the latest skylake i7s on some Ripjaws DDR4 tmpfs wasn't able to |
61 |
emerge it closer to 10 minutes. That would be quite an achievement compared |
62 |
to your current PC. |
63 |
|
64 |
-- |
65 |
Regards, |
66 |
Mick |