1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:26:16 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > > Which can be done with the -l option. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > You are mistaken: The -l option causes tar to warn if not all hars |
8 |
> > links to a file could not be resolved. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> You are right. I was referring to the --one-file-system, which I thought |
11 |
> had -l as the short option, but apparently not. Or has that changed in |
12 |
> the last couple of years? |
13 |
|
14 |
Tar did not change it's behavior with respect to -l during the past 31 years. |
15 |
|
16 |
On Linux, there is frequently gtar installed as tar and gtar is not respecting |
17 |
standards. Gtar in previous times was e.g. in conflict with the standard |
18 |
regarding to -l. Aprox. 10 years ago, I files a bug report against gtar for |
19 |
this standard deviation and it seems that they fixed this bug. |
20 |
|
21 |
Jörg |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
EMail:joerg@××××××××××××××××××××××××.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin |
25 |
js@××××××××××××.de (uni) |
26 |
joerg.schilling@××××××××××××××××.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ |
27 |
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily |