| 1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil <at> digimed.co.uk> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:09:37 +0000 (UTC), james wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > Also, I have not found a gcc-5.0 or gcc-5.1 in an overlay (yet), |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> eix -R -e gcc shows several options, the mpst recent of which appears to |
| 9 |
> be 5.0.0_alpha20150322 from the toolchain overlay. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Wow, I never tried the -R option..... Very Very cool! |
| 13 |
I was really hoping for 5.1; maybe the name of a dev on the edge? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
How do you tell if a ~9999 is actually based on the nightlies, |
| 17 |
5.1 or is just old ebuild with the .9999 extension somebody never |
| 18 |
got around to renaming or deleting? Look at |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
[4] "chromiumos" layman/chromiumos |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
and tell me (edumacate me?).... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
James |
Archives