| 1 |
on 02/25/2007 11:50 PM Dale wrote the following: |
| 2 |
> Agg wrote: |
| 3 |
>> on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> Agg wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following: |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>>> It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine |
| 11 |
>>>>> about "spam" (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG, |
| 12 |
>>>>> OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least |
| 13 |
>>>>> wrote something meaningful while all other of you "Responsible mailing |
| 14 |
>>>>> list users writing every little topic into its little proper mailing |
| 15 |
>>>>> list" just continue writing total nonsenses. |
| 16 |
>>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>>> |
| 18 |
>>>> All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual "spam". |
| 19 |
>>>> An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific case. |
| 20 |
>>>> |
| 21 |
>>>> |
| 22 |
>>>> |
| 23 |
>>> Then exactly what does this have to do with Gentoo, Linux or even a |
| 24 |
>>> computer? |
| 25 |
>>> |
| 26 |
>>> |
| 27 |
>> *Nothing*. It was written on the subject: *off-topic*:... |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> OK then. I'm going to start selling Viagra. I'll just put off-topic in |
| 32 |
> the subject line and it will be OK. ;-) |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Doesn't make sense to you either now huh? |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> Dale |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
That would be *spam* indeed, because of its *contents*. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives