1 |
On Samstag, 12. Januar 2008, Richard Marzan wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 07:34 -0600, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> > Mick wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Saturday 12 January 2008, Jil Larner wrote: |
5 |
> > >> Well, it's like if I am opening my eyes. I never looked at what the |
6 |
> > >> foundation was supposed to do. For a couple of years I've been using |
7 |
> > >> gentoo, I never get any political announcement, maybe because I didn't |
8 |
> > >> look at the right place, or maybe there was no. I mean that except the |
9 |
> > >> Gentoo's Philosophy and the Gentoo's Social Contract, I didn't see |
10 |
> > >> politic, for my eyes were probably closed. |
11 |
> > >> It doesn't mean I didn't enjoyed gentoo, its power, its flexibility, |
12 |
> > >> its community. But I certainly missed something. There are so many |
13 |
> > >> ways to communicate (lists, IRC, boards, wikis, project pages, etc.) |
14 |
> > >> that I must admit I'm sometime lost. |
15 |
> > >> |
16 |
> > >> Today, I learn we're in trouble. Good. What trouble ? What's happening |
17 |
> > >> ? Why through the words of Daniel Robbins, I feel some fear ? I feel |
18 |
> > >> he foresees a dead end and offers an opportunity to change before it |
19 |
> > >> is too late. Once more, to quote Matrix, "the problem is choice". In |
20 |
> > >> Free Software, there are often choices where the community can get |
21 |
> > >> involved in and it makes our strength. The problem is, and is not, |
22 |
> > >> legal papers. Because, IMO, legal papers are the visible part of an |
23 |
> > >> Iceberg. Could someone tell me what *really* is the crisis ? If people |
24 |
> > >> did not do what they were supposed to do : what should they have done |
25 |
> > >> ? |
26 |
> > >> |
27 |
> > >> Thanks. |
28 |
> > > |
29 |
> > > I am equally agnostic of Gentoo management politics, albeit grateful |
30 |
> > > that people volunteer their time and effort to keep it going. From the |
31 |
> > > little exposure that I have had to it all it seems to me that Alan's |
32 |
> > > views ring depressingly true. I read Daniel's blog and cannot disagree |
33 |
> > > with what he suggests - it makes common sense that users views and |
34 |
> > > desires should determine Gentoo's direction, but I have not read |
35 |
> > > between the lines to see how might his proposals lead to directions |
36 |
> > > that I would not readily agree with. See this excerpt of his below |
37 |
> > > from OSNews.com in 2002: |
38 |
> > > |
39 |
> > > "I very much want to find a way to turn the Gentoo Linux project into a |
40 |
> > > profitable enterprise. My main motivation in wanting to do this is so I |
41 |
> > > can stop living from paycheck to paycheck and focus my professional |
42 |
> > > efforts exclusively on Gentoo Linux development. Many of our developers |
43 |
> > > would like to do the same thing" |
44 |
> > > |
45 |
> > > (I am not critising this statement of his; after all I would very much |
46 |
> > > like to find myself a sustainable way of being able to do what I like - |
47 |
> > > without having to spend the biggest part of my day in my current job.) |
48 |
> > > |
49 |
> > > Giving a free hand to any single person is not safe in my humble view, |
50 |
> > > especially if that person is employed by Microsoft - I will find hard |
51 |
> > > to rest assured that there will be no conflict of interest. On the |
52 |
> > > other hand it seems that Gentoo desperately needs *mature* leadership, |
53 |
> > > which can fulfill some rather significant responsibilities. From what |
54 |
> > > I read the current Gentoo administration and management setup does not |
55 |
> > > seem to be able to behave with the professionalism required to achieve |
56 |
> > > that. This makes me anxious for the future of Gentoo. |
57 |
> > > |
58 |
> > > Just my 2c's. |
59 |
> > |
60 |
> > I have been using Gentoo for about 4 or 5 years now. I to think Gentoo |
61 |
> > has well, lost its way. It seems like a bunch of teenagers is running |
62 |
> > it sometimes. They decide something then go back a few steps when they |
63 |
> > don't like the results. Proctors come to mind on that. Users seems to |
64 |
> > be the last thing on the higher ups mind. That is not good. |
65 |
> > |
66 |
> > I love my Gentoo but I would like to see someone step up and get some |
67 |
> > things done and some decisions made, even those we may never know about. |
68 |
> > |
69 |
> > I just don't want to see Gentoo fall into the abyss. |
70 |
> > |
71 |
> > Dale |
72 |
> > |
73 |
> > :-) :-) |
74 |
> |
75 |
> Although he works for Microsoft, |
76 |
|
77 |
worked |
78 |
not works. |
79 |
> Daniel is the one who created this project |
80 |
|
81 |
and then he walked away. |
82 |
|
83 |
And don't forget his stunt last year, when he came back for 2 days and started |
84 |
a big fat flame war. |
85 |
-- |
86 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |