| 1 |
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:46 PM, walt<w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/27/2009 02:08 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, walt<w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> On 07/26/2009 01:25 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> I've been unsuccessfully trying to build the latest security patch |
| 9 |
>>>> version of Firefox 3.0. I keep getting the same error message after |
| 10 |
>>>> 3 days of re-syncing and retrying. The build dies early on in the |
| 11 |
>>>> patch-appliaction stage, so log.txt is small. The error message also |
| 12 |
>>>> mentioned to include the contents of the patch ".out" file, which I have |
| 13 |
>>>> done as log2.txt. Any ideas? |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> My ~amd64 machine skipped that version and went to 3.5.1 instead. |
| 16 |
>>> Is there a particular reason you don't want to do that? |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Possibly because it's not marked stable?... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> 3.0.12 is also marked unstable, so I assumed that Walter (the other one) |
| 22 |
> is running an unstable gentoo. Because these rapid updates to firefox |
| 23 |
> are all security patches it would be nice to get the latest one... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yeah, I agree. I wanted 3.0.12 also as 3.0.11 apparently has a |
| 26 |
security bug but I felt like 3.5 was probably a jump to big. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Cheers, |
| 29 |
Mark |
Archives