| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Heiko Baums <lists@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am 21.04.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Mike Gilbert: |
| 3 |
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Heiko Baums <lists@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Am 21.04.2015 um 01:27 schrieb Mike Gilbert: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>>> Better yet, upgrade to grub:2 already. |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> Why? As long as grub legacy is working there's no need to upgrade. I'm |
| 9 |
>>> still running grub legacy, too. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> In this context, because you can build it without having any 32-bit |
| 13 |
>> libs installed. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> That's what grub-static is for. So why would I upgrade to grub:2 if |
| 16 |
> grub:0 is still working? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Maybe because you don't like running static binaries that were built |
| 20 |
on somebody else's system. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'm just suggesting grub:2 as an alternative. |
Archives