| 1 |
Matt Connell wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Do you have any packages (or the global) keyword ~amd64? Portage, |
| 4 |
> fresh off of a sync, emerged ragel at 7.0.4 and col at 0.14.7 which are |
| 5 |
> both lower than the versions you mentioned. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
No ~amd64 (except dev-db/firebird because there is no stable |
| 8 |
version at all). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
(NEW) n ~ # eshowkw colm |
| 11 |
Keywords for dev-util/colm: |
| 12 |
| | u | |
| 13 |
| a a p s r a l | n | |
| 14 |
| m r h p p i i s l o m m | e u s | r |
| 15 |
| d a m p p c a x a s 3 p o 6 i | a s l | e |
| 16 |
| 6 r 6 p p 6 r 8 6 c 9 h n 8 p | p e o | p |
| 17 |
| 4 m 4 a c 4 c 6 4 v 0 a g k s | i d t | o |
| 18 |
-------------+-------------------------------+-------+------- |
| 19 |
0.13.0.7 | + + + + + + + + ~ o ~ ~ o o o | 7 # 0 | gentoo |
| 20 |
0.14.7 | + + + + + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ | 7 o | gentoo |
| 21 |
0.14.7-r1 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ | 8 # | gentoo |
| 22 |
[I]0.14.7-r2 | + ~ + ~ ~ + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ | 8 o | gentoo |
| 23 |
(NEW) n ~ # eshowkw ragel |
| 24 |
Keywords for dev-util/ragel: |
| 25 |
| | u | |
| 26 |
| a a p s r a l | n | |
| 27 |
| m r h p p i i s l o m m | e u s | r |
| 28 |
| d a m p p c a x a s 3 p o 6 i | a s l | e |
| 29 |
| 6 r 6 p p 6 r 8 6 c 9 h n 8 p | p e o | p |
| 30 |
| 4 m 4 a c 4 c 6 4 v 0 a g k s | i d t | o |
| 31 |
------------+-------------------------------+-------+------- |
| 32 |
6.10 | + + + + + + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ | 7 # 0 | gentoo |
| 33 |
7.0.0.12 | + + + + + + + + ~ o ~ ~ o o o | 7 o | gentoo |
| 34 |
7.0.4 | + + + + + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ | 7 o | gentoo |
| 35 |
7.0.4-r1 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ | 8 # | gentoo |
| 36 |
[I]7.0.4-r2 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ | 8 o | gentoo |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
colm-0.14.7-r2 is marked stable; with ragel-7.0.4, I get the |
| 39 |
error desscribed. ~ragel-7.0.4-r2 does work; didn't try |
| 40 |
~ragel-7.0.4-r1. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
But "works for me" now :-) |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-Matt |
Archives