Archives
Archives
| From: | Kristian Poul Herkild <kristian@×××××××.dk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary | ||
| Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:17:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | 438D50E2.3030207@herkild.dk | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary by Joseph |
||
| 1 | Joseph wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from |
| 4 | >binary. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | >I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for |
| 7 | >7-hours already. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | It's likely to take somewhere around 8-11 hours on such a machine. It |
| 12 | took somewhere around 10 hours for me on a 1500 MHz Athlon XP with 1 GB RAM. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Whether or not you can benefit from compiling is unknown to me. But it's |
| 15 | more fun ;) |
| 16 | |
| 17 | - |
| 18 | Kristian Poul Herkild |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary | Uwe Klosa <uwe.klosa@×××××.se> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary | "Mariusz Pękala" <skoot@××.pl> |