| 1 |
On 08/22/2014 10:36 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk |
| 3 |
> <alexander.kapshuk@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> As I updated my system today, I noticed that 'sys-fs/lvm2' got updated |
| 5 |
>> amongst other packages as well. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I don't use LVM on my system. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> If I understand it correctly, 'sys-fs/lvm2' is a required dependency for |
| 10 |
>> 'sys-fs/udisks/udisks-1.0.5-r1': |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> equery d sys-fs/lvm2 |
| 13 |
>> * These packages depend on sys-fs/lvm2: |
| 14 |
>> sys-block/parted-3.1-r1 (device-mapper ? >=sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.45) |
| 15 |
>> sys-boot/grub-2.00_p5107-r2 (device-mapper ? >=sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.45) |
| 16 |
>> sys-fs/udisks-1.0.5-r1 (>=sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.66) |
| 17 |
>> sys-fs/udisks-2.1.3 (cryptsetup ? sys-fs/lvm2[udev(+)]) |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> equery -q u sys-block/parted | grep device-mapper |
| 20 |
>> -device-mapper |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> equery -q u sys-boot/grub | grep device-mapper |
| 23 |
>> -device-mapper |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> equery -q u '=sys-fs/udisks-1.0.5-r1' |
| 26 |
>> -debug |
| 27 |
>> +nls |
| 28 |
>> -remote-access |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> $ equery -q u '=sys-fs/udisks-2.1.3' | grep cryptsetup |
| 31 |
>> -cryptsetup |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>> /usr/portage/sys-fs/udisks/udisks-1.0.5-r1.ebuild:17,24 |
| 34 |
>> COMMON_DEPEND=">=dev-libs/dbus-glib-0.100 |
| 35 |
>> <snip> |
| 36 |
>> >=sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.66 |
| 37 |
>> |
| 38 |
>> What are my options, if I were to remove 'sys-fs/lvm2' altogether? |
| 39 |
> Remove sys-fs/udisks:0, which depends unconditionally on LVM2; also, |
| 40 |
> it's on life support, AFAIR. sys-fs/udisks:2 is actively maintained |
| 41 |
> and it depends only conditionally on LVM2. |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
>> What would you recommend doing about it? |
| 44 |
> What does depend on sys-fs/udisks? What's the output from "equery d |
| 45 |
> sys-fs/udisks"? Most applications switched to udisks-2, but some are |
| 46 |
> still stuck with udisks-1 (XMBC, now Kodi, comes to mind). |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> If an application that you absolutely need requires sys-fs/udisks:0, |
| 49 |
> then you will need LVM2 also. |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> Regards. |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
Looks like I've got a couple of apps that do require udisks-1 to run: |
| 54 |
equery d sys-fs/udisks |
| 55 |
* These packages depend on sys-fs/udisks: |
| 56 |
gnome-base/gvfs-1.20.2 (udisks ? >=sys-fs/udisks-1.97:2) |
| 57 |
xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.0 (udisks ? sys-fs/udisks:0) |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
So I'm going to have to keep lvm2 then. |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
Thanks. |
Archives