| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mick did opine |
| 2 |
thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > Considering that ~250 devices consumes a teeny-weeny bit of disk space |
| 5 |
> > and they are hidden from view normally, I say it's worth it leaving them |
| 6 |
> > in. Which is what vapier also says. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I see. In my head it is as if we're going against the udev principle of |
| 9 |
> populating required device nodes. If udev does not start, isn't it time |
| 10 |
> to head for the nearest LiveCD, or must we ensure that every breakage is |
| 11 |
> fixable in single-user mode? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I don't think we have to go that far. I think we should at least take |
| 14 |
reasonable steps to ensure the single-user mode works at all. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives