1 |
On 2012-03-13 08:13, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I've also thought about this and I also want to ask why? |
4 |
|
5 |
Hm... me too? :-) |
6 |
|
7 |
> I stopped using a separate /usr on my workstations a long time ago when |
8 |
> I realized it was pointless. The days of 5M hard disks when the entire |
9 |
|
10 |
Ok, you realized it was pointless for *you*, right? It's not a universal |
11 |
fact, as far as I can see... Recall the previous discussion about this |
12 |
very same subject, where I compared unix to "lego"? Flexibility is the |
13 |
keyword here, I think, that some of us do not want to forego. For |
14 |
instance I can very well see myself indulging in some SSDs that I could |
15 |
put in my 'puter where one is dedicated for /usr, one for /var and one |
16 |
for the root file system, whereas I would keep a big normal HDD for /home... |
17 |
|
18 |
In my opinion there's a lot of "hand waving" that basically says |
19 |
something like "on a modern desktop system, complex software is needed, |
20 |
therefore /usr needs to be on the root file system (or mounted via |
21 |
initrd)"... and states this as a universal fact, without answering the |
22 |
question "Why?". Isn't it those who wants to change that should answer |
23 |
why they want to change? And I trust Poetterings/Sievers answer why it |
24 |
needs to change as far as I can throw either of them (I'm quite weak)... |
25 |
it's all tied in neatly into their (IMO) overly complex software. |
26 |
|
27 |
Hm, if we want to be modern, perhaps we should abolish partitions |
28 |
altogether and put everything in the cloud? That would be "modern", |
29 |
right? ;-) |
30 |
|
31 |
I'm running a decent desktop system (Xfce4) and I have /usr on a |
32 |
separate partition without any initrd... Why would I need to change this |
33 |
(except from being forced if I continue to use udev)? So far the only |
34 |
technical reason I've heard that somehow requires udev to have access to |
35 |
files in /usr is a bluetooth keyboard. Anything else that *needs* to be |
36 |
working during boot (before a separate /usr can be mounted)? And in my |
37 |
opinion, if a keyboard needs complex software to work then it's broken |
38 |
by design. |
39 |
|
40 |
But I digress, I really should start coding my own solutions, as Canek |
41 |
says... |
42 |
|
43 |
Best regards |
44 |
|
45 |
Peter K |