From: | Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Spamassasin Pulling in GNUPG - Why? | ||
Date: | Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:10:35 | ||
Message-Id: | 87ver1y6yd.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Spamassasin Pulling in GNUPG - Why? by Ow Mun Heng |
1 | Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@×××.com> writes: |
2 | |
3 | > You;re Right. Why is that? |
4 | > Does anyone knows? |
5 | |
6 | The updated rule sets fetched by sa-update are signed, so sa-update |
7 | calls gnupg to validate them. So the spamassassin ebuild has a hard |
8 | dependency on gnupg. |
9 | -- |
10 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |