| 1 |
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 2 |
<volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Please. He's completely right in demanding apologies and a swift |
| 4 |
>> reaction to the problem -because if users cannot access the list due to |
| 5 |
>> undocumented stuff, it's a problem. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> no, he is absolutly wrong in demanding everything. Nobody is paid to be here |
| 8 |
> or answer his mails. He asked something nobody was able to or willing to |
| 9 |
> answer. The html mails were a different problem. And now he thinks that his |
| 10 |
> problem was caused by html - instead it was caused by a lack of |
| 11 |
> knowledge/willingness in participation. |
| 12 |
Guys I think you need to take a breather. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I didn't demand an apology. |
| 15 |
I didn't even demand an answer. |
| 16 |
Go look at the OP and the replies and take an objective look at the |
| 17 |
words. Whatever the venomous, naggy, pompous, self-righteous - or even |
| 18 |
injured - attitude it is you might be projecting just isn't present at |
| 19 |
all. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I just said "hey, look around you guys, here's a problem, and here's |
| 22 |
some proof that we have it." btw, why is it a problem? If I was just |
| 23 |
as surprised at the unexpected tones of the responses then, I'm not |
| 24 |
now. Whatever's been said has been said, and this is the Internet |
| 25 |
after all. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If it explodes so quickly in everyone's face just to see an issue even |
| 28 |
mentioned - then I'm apologizing on behalf of everyone. As far as I'm |
| 29 |
concerned, the problem is identified and the obvious solution - some |
| 30 |
subscription-level FAQ/warning - works and has already been suggested |
| 31 |
to the bugs people. There's no need for the rest of this. |
Archives