1 |
Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Saturday 22 Mar 2014 00:28:04 Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
4 |
>>> Judging by replies so far, I'd guess not many at all. You can't |
5 |
>>> possibly know how many will or will not plonk someone. In the meantime |
6 |
>>> Dale, I think you are projecting. Chill out brother, chill out. Plenty |
7 |
>>> stuff in the world more deserving of attention than this. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> I fixed it now. No more problems. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Dale |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> :-) :-) |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Some of us read all, but reply only where we think we can add value |
16 |
and when |
17 |
> time allows. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> There is no need really on this list for verbal abuse, especially when a |
20 |
> contributor has offered well considered advice and carefully articulated |
21 |
> opinion. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Nevertheless, I also find personally addressed emails annoying, but it |
24 |
can be |
25 |
> fixed by setting up a filter on most mail clients to drop them in the |
26 |
> corresponding M/L. This may be a more civil way than alienating |
27 |
people who |
28 |
> want to join this community. I'm just saying ... |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
If a person sends html messages to this list, there is quite a few that |
32 |
will block because they can't read them. Same as with quite a few other |
33 |
things that is not liked on this list. Folks don't like html and don't |
34 |
like getting two copies of the same message. My point was and still is, |
35 |
if he doesn't want to conform to what this list expects, he will be |
36 |
blacklisted by people on this list. Period. It's nothing personal |
37 |
about it since I would inform anyone else of the same thing. It's |
38 |
really that simple. |
39 |
|
40 |
I still remember when I first joined this list. I was told the same |
41 |
thing about my email program sending html. If I had not conformed to |
42 |
the requests of people on this mailing list, I would have been |
43 |
blacklisted by a large group of people and was told that I would by some |
44 |
of the very ones that would do it. When joining a community, you |
45 |
conform to what is expected. You don't join and then force everyone |
46 |
else to conform to what you want. All Tom had to do is not CC |
47 |
everyone. Real simple. No harder than me telling my software to send |
48 |
text only message to gentoo.org. |
49 |
|
50 |
It seemed to me that Tom refused the request of quite a few people even |
51 |
after several asked him to change. Based on that, I blacklisted him. |
52 |
That is something I rarely do but hey, it is what it is. I fixed his |
53 |
problem for him. I suspect others have done the same. |
54 |
|
55 |
BTW, I have yet to see him add much of anything to any discussion. I've |
56 |
seen his posts on -dev as well. I won't now but still. ;-) |
57 |
|
58 |
Dale |
59 |
|
60 |
:-) :-) |
61 |
|
62 |
-- |
63 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
64 |
how you interpreted my words! |