Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: pdf viewing suggestions?
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:05:20
Message-Id: hm49kd$bmi$1@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] pdf viewing suggestions? by "Sebastian Beßler"
1 On 2010-02-24, Sebastian Be?ler <sebastian@××××××××××××.de> wrote:
2 > Am 24.02.2010 21:21, schrieb Neal Hogan:
3 >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:19 PM, daid kahl <daidxor@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >>> [snips from daid / Willie Wong]
5 >>
6 >>>
7 >>>> Unfortunately there aren't that many pdf viewing softwares to choose from.
8 >>>
9 >>> We seem to be doing well so far!
10 >>
11 >> I use mupdf with OpenBSD and I like it (vi-like bindings). Not too
12 >> sure if Gentoo has the port/package. A quick "gentoo mupdf" google had
13 >> a few hits . . . but I didn't look at any of the links to see what
14 >> they were talking about.
15 >
16 > Shao ~ # eix mupdf
17 > * app-text/mupdf
18 > Available versions: (~)0.5[1] (~)20090703[2] {+cjk debug jbig jpeg2k}
19 > Homepage: http://ccxvii.net/mupdf
20 > Description: Lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in
21 > portable C.
22 >
23 > [1] "gentoo-china" layman/gentoo-china
24 > [2] "rion" layman/rion
25 >
26 > It is not in portage tree but in those two overlays.
27
28 I just built mupdf 0.5 from sources (after emerging ftjam), and
29 mupdf segfaulted a few pages into the first document I opened.
30 That and the inability to search are going to make it a
31 non-starter for me.
32
33 It is small and fast, though.
34
35 --
36 Grant Edwards grante Yow! It's some people
37 at inside the wall! This is
38 visi.com better than mopping!