1 |
On 6/27/07, James Ausmus <james.ausmus@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 6/26/07, reader@×××××××.com <reader@×××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> writes: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > [...] |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > > What has the hdd temp to do with cpu tmeprature? |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > [...] |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > > hddtemp and cputemp are completly and totally unrelated. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > [...] |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > First ... thanks for the other tips.. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > I think you fellows may have this a bit wrong. I have three video |
18 |
> > editing desktops all running win xp. On them I use a piece of |
19 |
> > software called `Hardware sensors monitor' or Hmonitor. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > I've noticed over time (mnths) that when the cpu gets hot, the hdd are |
22 |
> > also at elevated temps. Maybe not critical but well above where the |
23 |
> > run normally. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > This is on three different midtower boxes, so I have surmized that |
26 |
> > although the heating of cpu may not be related mechanically to hdd |
27 |
> > temp, in fact they rise and fall together due probably to close |
28 |
> > proximity and being contained in same box. |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > I realize this is not a definitive experiment but for my uses it does |
31 |
> > work like that. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Just as a note on a possible explanation for your observations in your |
34 |
> Windows boxes: |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Most likely (CMIIW), when you notice the CPU and HDD temps rise, you |
37 |
> are actively doing video editing - a CPU and memory *and* hard drive |
38 |
> intensive task. When hard drives are "driven hard", they heat up. When |
39 |
> CPU's are "driven hard", they heat up. If the computers main |
40 |
> functionality is a task that tends to "drive hard" both the CPU and |
41 |
> the hard drive, then yes, you will see a correspondence in the CPU/HDD |
42 |
> temperature patterns. However, this does not mean that you *cannot* |
43 |
> drive the CPU hard without driving the HDD hard, and vice versa - just |
44 |
> because the are both being driven hard when you do video editing does |
45 |
> not mean that they are inextricably linked to each other in workload |
46 |
> and temperature profile. |
47 |
> |
48 |
> What operations are being performed on your Gentoo box when you see |
49 |
> these CPU temperature warnings? |
50 |
> |
51 |
> -James |
52 |
> |
53 |
> |
54 |
> > |
55 |
> > -- |
56 |
> > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
57 |
> > |
58 |
> > |
59 |
> -- |
60 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
61 |
> |
62 |
> |
63 |
|
64 |
You can drive a CPU heavily without crunching disk IO, just windows |
65 |
doen't do that so well ( espcially the case if you run out of ram and |
66 |
drive into swap,.. which windows seems more predisposed to doing in my |
67 |
experience ). You want an example of how to do this, then open any |
68 |
high-level math software, ie: povray, video-encoding, compression, |
69 |
SETI. |
70 |
|
71 |
And you can drive hard-drives heavily without your CPU getting hot |
72 |
too, I think its something related to DMA and the fact we no longer |
73 |
use PIO ( well.. at least i hope not ), simply by performing |
74 |
disk-to-disk transfers ( while there will still be a lot of CPU usage, |
75 |
its still a bit less than you'd get without offloading ), this is |
76 |
especially the case if you have a real RAID system and your doing a |
77 |
RAID controlled mirror ( it has its own processor to control that ) |
78 |
|
79 |
The similarity in temperatures tho, may be related to the dynamics of |
80 |
case design ( ill pretend to know what im talking about, im no |
81 |
professor on this, but i have worked out how to cut degrees ). In the |
82 |
closed case, most of the time ( at least in my experience ) the |
83 |
majority of hard-drive cooling is passive, relying soley on the |
84 |
lone-case-fan by the CPU, or even relying on the cooling fans in the |
85 |
PSU, and generally, at least in all the tower PCS ive seen, the heat |
86 |
flows out of the hard drives and over the CPU / Northbridge . |
87 |
|
88 |
Often, this is a big sodding melting pot of heat, with your GPU just |
89 |
under the northbridge, the CPU just up from the northbridge, that area |
90 |
can get a bit heated, and the extra heat from the hard drives I |
91 |
believe lowers the effectiveness of the CPU cooler somewhat. My |
92 |
solution was not a very pretty one, but it works like a bloody charm. |
93 |
|
94 |
I effectively made a breakout-box for my hard drives, ( well, 4 bars |
95 |
of aluminium with holes in it for screwing them together ) with all |
96 |
the hard drives mounted in parallel in a 'portrait' position. ( to |
97 |
allow heat to flow up over the drives unconstricted ) and mounted 2 |
98 |
cooling fans on the sides to blow cool air over the hard drives and |
99 |
back into the room ( EM purists look away here .... ) basically |
100 |
isolating the cooling systems as as not to be so codepenant. To do |
101 |
this i need to have my case panels off 24/7, i admit, but my case is |
102 |
so crap that keeping them on is too much effort. |
103 |
|
104 |
In summary : CPU temp cannot be accurately measured with HDD sensor |
105 |
probes, ...especially as CPU is up from hard drives in most cases, and |
106 |
heat .. generally rises. |
107 |
If console logs are complainging about CPU over-heat, then either its |
108 |
overheating, your thresholds are too low, ...or whatevers doing the |
109 |
measurement is broken. |
110 |
|
111 |
If you cant find out from some in-linux tool what the problem is, ... |
112 |
you may want to find some sort of alternative way of measuring |
113 |
temperature ( ... laser thermometer might be an idea ... ) |
114 |
|
115 |
Either way, best of luck . |
116 |
-- |
117 |
Kent |
118 |
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x| |
119 |
print "enNOSPicAMreil kdrtf@×××.com"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}' |
120 |
-- |
121 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |