| 1 |
should be /var/git/openrc# git pull --rebase |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 12/1/09, Maxim Wexler <maxim.wexler@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> so tell me how come none of you quarter-brights have responded to the |
| 5 |
> email where I say this problem has been fixed? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> you want to help? answer me this: why did # /var/git/openrc/git pull |
| 8 |
> --rebase update all init.d services except net.lo? That's today's |
| 9 |
> scintillating question. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> On 12/1/09, Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 12 |
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Maxim Wexler <maxim.wexler@×××××.com> |
| 13 |
>> wrote: |
| 14 |
>>> We just want to help you -- that's what the police say before they tase |
| 15 |
>>> your ass |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> On 12/1/09, Maxim Wexler <maxim.wexler@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 18 |
>>>> meh, you got nothing |
| 19 |
>>>> |
| 20 |
>>>> On 12/1/09, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 21 |
>>>>> On Tuesday 01 December 2009 22:19:24 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 22 |
>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:57:58 -0700, Maxim Wexler wrote: |
| 23 |
>>>>>> > Fine, then read what I say and, until you know better, believe it. |
| 24 |
>>>>>> |
| 25 |
>>>>>> OK, you're right, everyone else is wrong and there's no point in any |
| 26 |
>>>>>> of |
| 27 |
>>>>>> us trying to help you. |
| 28 |
>>>>>> |
| 29 |
>>>>> |
| 30 |
>>>>> Wise Chinese man say: young tempestuous fellow need to bang head on |
| 31 |
>>>>> rock |
| 32 |
>>>>> many |
| 33 |
>>>>> more time before lesson be learned. Allow young man to bang head, |
| 34 |
>>>>> obviously |
| 35 |
>>>>> he |
| 36 |
>>>>> like. Maybe he get head rush? |
| 37 |
>>>>> |
| 38 |
>>>>> One day he'll realise that he has installed a combination of software |
| 39 |
>>>>> packages |
| 40 |
>>>>> that just does not do what suits him best. Then he will change it. |
| 41 |
>>>>> Until |
| 42 |
>>>>> then, |
| 43 |
>>>>> well, many happy non-booting returns! |
| 44 |
>>>>> |
| 45 |
>>>>> |
| 46 |
>>>>> -- |
| 47 |
>>>>> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
| 48 |
>> |
| 49 |
>> I *almost* feel sorry for you, after several people here have tried to |
| 50 |
>> help, even WITHOUT you giving an actual direct error message that |
| 51 |
>> you're receiving beyond the *expected* behavior of the fsck being |
| 52 |
>> skipped on boot, and even despite your being belligerent toward |
| 53 |
>> several of the most helpful people I've seen on the list overall. What |
| 54 |
>> I do fail to understand, though, is why a person would post, asking |
| 55 |
>> for help, disregard every bit of help given, and *both* act as though |
| 56 |
>> they're being forced to listen to help they didn't ask for *and* as |
| 57 |
>> though they're not getting any help at all. If someone gives you an |
| 58 |
>> answer that is wrong for the situation as you see it, it typically |
| 59 |
>> means one of two things... 1) you didn't give all the details needed |
| 60 |
>> for them to understand what you're seeing and to know WHY the answer |
| 61 |
>> they're giving isn't correct, which 2) you're overlooking or ignoring |
| 62 |
>> something that they're trying to point out in their answer and, |
| 63 |
>> despite what you may want to hear, they are in fact correct. Now, |
| 64 |
>> a-typically, it's possible you know what's wrong, what's causing it, |
| 65 |
>> and the solution, so you can instantly know that answers you're |
| 66 |
>> receiving are wrong... but in my experience, in those cases, people |
| 67 |
>> don't waste other people's time asking for help. |
| 68 |
>> |
| 69 |
>> -- |
| 70 |
>> Poison [BLX] |
| 71 |
>> Joshua M. Murphy |
| 72 |
>> |
| 73 |
>> |
| 74 |
> |
Archives